In a good discussion during the LA Auto Show, I think the agreed “hype” will result in some very useful innovations in safety. The carmakers are taking the lead before they get regulated by governments unaware of the engineering limitations.
“For 100 years, automobiles have been a mechanical engineering industry,” said the center’s director, Dragos Maciuca, who on his morning commute drives past a nearby research center of German automotive electronics and parts supplier Bosch. “Now, there is the shift to software — and the mecca of software is Silicon Valley.”
How much software will it take to launch autonomous cars into the real world? A lot, and it seems the industry is investing heavily to be first to market. A lot different than the DSRC thing very few know about.
I wonder how the “continued effort” will continue in the wake of massive spending shifts affecting PC development also revealed at the Intel investor meeting.
amazingly, his seat swivels clockwise, away from the window. The seat clicks into place, now facing a full 90 degrees away from the windshield, and the driver closes his eyes.
Fiction for now, but maybe soon drivers will be paid to sleep and drive! Yet a 10% distraction otherwise results in 700% increased risk of crashing per Virginia Tech. There needs to be a solution, or several. JAHoffmann.com
We prefer these OEM-technologies over Android Auto or Apple CarPlay as they provide (at least some) interfaces to the car’s data which we can use to create exciting, fun or useful apps!
I think “fun and useful” applications for a car buyer including styling and performance on the road that tech providers have little to do with when investing over $20K+ USD buying a car.
Clearly a deal breaker for premium cars, expect a 5-10X multiplier in the end user cost of a Lidar based safety system. What will YOU pay for safety delivered by technology?